Loading...

Intangible Value: Measuring the Abstract Assets in a Going Concern Valuation

How the Appropriate Unit of Comparison for Going-concern Valuation, Substantiated Through Regression Analysis, can Provide a More Precise Appraisal

The process of commercial property valuation is often viewed as a mystery, or more dangerously, as a simplistic process of data compilation. Value, however, is determined by complex interactions between market participants, real property, and often the operating business as is the case with going-concern valuation and gas stations.

 

Going-Concern Value is defined as the value of a business enterprise that is expected to continue to operate into the future. The intangible elements of Going Concern Value result from factors such as having a trained work force, an operational plant, and the necessary licenses, systems, and procedures in place.

 

How does an appraiser consider all these factors in their going-concern valuation? How does one measure the financial benefit of a successful business operation compared to an inferior one? One of the first challenges that an appraiser faces in estimating going- concern value is selecting the most appropriate unit of comparison. There are several methods employed by an appraiser to value the going-concern. In this article we focus on the relationship between gross profit per square foot and the going-concern sale price

per square foot. Going-concern value is a function of sales, profit, expenses, volume, margins, and so on. When considering a going-concern the appraiser must decide what unit of comparison will be utilized to prescribe the most accurate market value to the going-concern. In other words, which comparison has the most consistent relationship to the sale price? A reliable way of determining which comparison is the most reliable is through regression analysis.

 

Regression Analysis  is a statistical process for estimating the relationships among variables. It includes many techniques for modeling and analyzing several variables, when the focus is on the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables.

 

A conventional Sales Comparison Approach based on price per square foot or other physical traits such as number of pumps, land area, or fueling positions is not considered meaningful for going-concern gas station valuation. Such an analysis may be appropriate in the Cost Approach for estimating underlying land value, it is not considered appropriate when appraising gas stations as buyers and sellers rely more so on sales volume, profit, and net income, and less on the size of the building or number of pumps.

The linear regression attempts to explain this relationship with a straight line to best fit the comparable data set. The linear model is stated as y = a + bx whereas y equals subject value and a and b are coefficients (slope and intercept) that determine the angle of the regression line. In the regression formula the R-Squared value is always between 0.00 and 1.00. In a perfect relationship where x predicts y the R-Squared value would be near 1.00. When no relationship exists between the variables the R-Squared value would be 0.00. The “goodness of fit” or accuracy of the line is reflected in the R-Squared number.

GP/SF Versus Sales Price/SF Regression Analysis

Based on Retail Petroleum’s proprietary data base of hundreds of gas station going- concern sales and over 5,000 gas station appraisals, the most meaningful unit of comparison with highest R-Squared is consistently gross profit per square foot versus sales price per square foot. This relationship is depicted in the following chart.

GP:SF Versus Sales Price per Square Foot

The preceding chart depicts 10 going-concern gas station sales showing the Regression Formula and R-Square statistical measure in the upper right hand corner. The y-axis references Sales Price /SF while the x-axis references GP/SF. The subject value (y) can easily be solved by knowing x, the subject’s GP/SF (gross profit per square foot).

Take for example a 1,000 square foot gas station going-concern with $400 in gross profit per square foot (x). You will note the red line moving up from the x-axis at $400 hits with the regression line between $1,000 and $1,500 per square foot on the y-axis, supporting a sale price per square foot near $1,400 or approximately $1,400,000 ($1,400,000 X 1,000 SF = $1,400,000). Let’s see how accurate this estimate is using the regression formula:

Y  = 3.3836(X) + 63.5730

Sales Price/SF = 3.3826($400)  + 63.5730

Sales Price/SF = 1,353.040 + 63.5730

Sales Price/SF = $1,416.613

Now that we have calculated Sales Price/SF at $1,416.613 we can factor it by the subject’s building size of 1,000 square feet to support a going-concern value of $1,416,613, note this value nearly matches our initial estimate at $1,400,000.

$1,416.613  X  1,000  = $1,416,613

Price/SF Versus Sale Price Regression Analysis

The price per square foot unit analysis is commonplace methodology used by many appraisers for fee simple improved properties and land valuation. This approach is problematic for gas station going-concern valuation. Because two identical properties could have very different cash flows, the use of price per square foot analyses or other physical unit of comparison without adjustment for cash flow characteristics often leads to misleading results.

Obviously, a property that has more income per square foot should sell for a higher price, all other factors being equal and assuming gas station is the highest and best use. This is because buyers purchase gas stations based on their cash flow potential as reflected in the gross profit per square foot analyses. If we eliminate the gross profit variable in the regression analysis, observe what happens to the R-Squared value as shown in the following chart.

Building (SF) Versus Sales Price per SF

The R-Squared value decreased from a strong indication of 0.9229 in the GP/SF Versus Sales Price/SF Regression Analysis to 0.6295 in the Price/SF Versus Sale Price Regression Analysis. Note the value is now near $1,750,000 and much higher than the first regression. The “goodness of fit” or accuracy of the line is inferior to the first regression analysis, significantly reducing reliability and resulting in a 20% higher value than the GP/SF Versus Sales Price/SF Regression Analysis.

Building  (SF) Versus Sale Price Regression Analysis

Our last regression analysis further reduces the variables to only price and building square feet. Note the reduced R-Squared value is now 0.4006. Acceptable R-Squared values vary according to property types, market conditions, and investor preferences. Though, there are no common rules of thumb, in or practice when R-Squared values drop below 0.5000 the relationship between the variables may be too weak for reliable going- concern valuation.

Note the yellow shaded area in the following regression chart based on Building (SF) Versus Sale Price representing the area in which the subject value should fall based on the comparable data set. This is much wider range than with the previous two regression indicators. The first regression based on GP/SF Versus Sales Price/SF with stronger R- Squared value supports a much narrower area of value. Conversely, the red line in the following chart shows the range in potential value from approximately $600,000 to $2,750,000. The range exhibited by the previous stronger R-Squared regressions was much tighter.

Building (SF) Versus Price

Within our own business practice, and exhibited herein, Retail Petroleum Consultants has created a comparative regression analysis based on the data we have compiled after nearly five thousand appraisals of gas stations, car washes, c-stores, and quick service restaurants. Through our research, as demonstrated by the regression analysis, we have found that Gross profit per square foot versus sales price per square foot has the strongest correlation (R-Squared) to the actual sale price of the going-concern. This valuation approach represents a crucial difference between the expertise of an appraiser specializing in going concern, as opposed to a generalist appraiser incorrectly employing per unit analyses based on physical characteristics.

When appraising a going concern, a generalist appraiser often mistakenly relies on the more simplistic method of comparing sales price per square foot. While this valuation is perfectly applicable for land valuation or fee simple commercial buildings, it can drastically alter the estimated value of the going-concern, most often resulting in overestimating value and real estate allocation while failing to adequately identify business or include value. Unlike gross profit per square foot, price per unit indicators fail to consider the cash flow potential of the going-concern, which is what buyers and sellers rely on when making sound going-concern gas station purchase decisions.

The results of this analysis indicates that the gross profit per square foot versus the price per square foot has the strongest correlation and is proven the best unit of comparison for going-concern gas station appraisal.

Going concern appraisals should be left to a specialist with experience to analyze gross profit and relevant financial measures. Unfortunately, information on gross profit from comparable sales can be difficult to obtain. Brokers generally sign nondisclosure agreements and cannot reveal an operator’s sensitive financial data and fuel volumes. Often the only way to obtain this data is by having appraised thousands of gas station properties and use of proprietary non-public data bases. An appraiser with access to a comprehensive financial database, such as that maintained by RPC, can perform more accurate valuations of a going-concern, as opposed to a generalist appraiser who generally lacks this resource.

About our Reports
The creation of these articles supports Retail Petroleum’s mission to provide clients and industry advocates with timely information and insights about our ever-evolving industry. The partners at Retail Petroleum fund the articles. The information was not commissioned by any business or institution.